×
ECR

Henkel: “The JRC calls itself a research institute, but it looks like a bureaucratic authority”

20 April 2016

Henkel: “The JRC calls itself a research institute, but it looks like a bureaucratic authority”

Hans-Olaf Henkel MEP comments on the Joint Research Centre.

The EMIS inquiry committee held its first witness hearing today. The Joint Research Centre (JRC) and the International Council for Clean Transportation (ICCT) were invited. The JRC had already identified gaps in the European type approval system that could result in manipulation in the measurement of emissions through the possible use of a “cheat software”, or “defeat device” back in 2011 and 2013. These gaps and the accompanying possibility of manipulation should have caused some skepticism, especially since the emission values have been exceeded up to 47 times under real driving emissions (RDE) test conditions. Because it would have been outside its former mandate, the JRC refrained from further investigation of the potential use of defeat devices. The only response of the European Commission to the findings of the JRC was to establish a working group on RDE tests.

Hans-Olaf Henkel, MEP for the ALFA-party and coordinator and shadow rapporteur for the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR), the third largest group in the Parliament, commented today’s hearing with the following words: “I myself have led a research association with 86 research organizations. Researchers are genuinely curious. The JRC calls itself a research institute, but it looks like a typical Brussels-based bureaucratic authority! The biggest surprise was discovering that in 1998, US authorities fined a number of car manufacturers for the use of defeat devices and that no European or national authority took this as an opportunity to investigate whether such practice also existed in Europe! That should have come as a real bombshell!”

He also criticized the JRC for sending to the hearing a director who has been in office for less than six months and whose responsibilities do not include technical issues and emissions tests despite the fact that this was at the heart of today’s hearing.

SHARE

ECR

OUR TWEETS

Anna Fotyga - Biuro Poselskie

44 minutes ago

We stand by the people of #Iran. We try to expose every case of cruelty against them, including miniorites, who are… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

ECR Group

yesterday

Congratulations to Andrzej Duda for his re-election as the President of the Republic of #Poland 🇵🇱. We wish him a s… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

ECR Group

4 days ago

ECR MEP Derk Jan Eppink: “In 1995, #Srebrenica showed us our inability to fight against #genocide. This event made… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

ECR Group

4 days ago

MEP Elżbieta Rafalska: “We need to respect Roma’s culture & identity by listening to their voice. It is the only wa… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

ECR Group

4 days ago

The EU #MobilityPackage rules are harmful & represent double-dealing. It generates an enormous ecological burden. T… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

ECR Group

5 days ago

MEP Emmanouil Fragkos: “#Turkey is a threat to security in the Eastern Mediterranean & threatens the borders of 🇬🇷… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

ECR Group

5 days ago

ECR MEP Bert-Jan Ruissen: “Protecting religious freedom is extremely important & should be defended worldwide. The… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

ECR Group

5 days ago

The ECR endorses the statement of @EP_President to #China to abolish the new security law, defending #RuleOfLaw,… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

ECR Group

5 days ago

"Today we have only one certainty: there is no more time, it is time to act." Watch the full speech of ECR Co-chair… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

ECR Group

5 days ago

MEP Margarita de la Pisa on the EU's public health strategy: "We need technical protocols to protect us from potent… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…





© 2018. All rights reserved. European Conservatives and Reformists Group