×
ECR

Parliament pesticides report does not reflect expert testimony

16 January 2019

Parliament pesticides report does not reflect expert testimony

A report containing politically motivated recommendations to overhaul the way pesticides are authorised for use in the European Union reflects poorly on the European Parliament, warned ECR MEP Anthea McIntyre today.

The European Parliament’s special committee on pesticides is proposing that many powers to licence products are removed from member states and centralised in Brussels, despite hearing from experts that the present system works well.

It is also calling for the decision to re-licence the world’s most popular weed killer Glyphosate to be re-assessed, just 12 months after the substance was declared as safe for use and approved for the European market.

McIntyre, who is ECR Group coordinator on Parliament’s special committee on Pesticides, said the report included discredited assertions simply “to provide a platform for campaigning MEPs ahead of the European elections in May.”

She told the Parliament in Strasbourg: “The EU approval process for plant protection products is one of the most stringent systems in the world, yet to read the committee’s report you really wouldn’t think so. It has been prepared in a very selective manner with many expert contributions being intentionally disregarded.

“The report is very disappointing and reflects poorly on our institution. We should be supporting a fact-based approach to policy making.”

Miss McIntyre believes the current system could be improved by increasing transparency, supporting new farming techniques to reduce pesticide use and encouraging the development of novel substances which would make older, more persistent chemicals obsolete.

She added: “The Commission, EU regulatory agencies, Member State authorities and Greenpeace all gave evidence to the committee and said it was not flaws in the legislation that needed to be addressed. Instead they argued that improvements were required in its implementation.

“The committee has a duty to reflect the expert testimony, even when this may be inconvenient for some political groups and campaigners. But it has singularly failed to do so.”

The report was approved today by Parliament. It has no legal authority but is likely to inform future decision making on the approval and authorisation process for pesticides.

SHARE

ECR

OUR TWEETS

ECR Group

12 hours ago

The ultimatum of "more Europe or no Europe" so often proposed by Euro-federalists need not be taken seriously. 👉… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

Anna Fotyga Biuro Poselskie

13 hours ago

Neither #Belsat nor other independent media are extremists. There is only one extremist in #Belarus: #Lukashenko. A… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

ECR Group

2 days ago

If adopted in its current state, the #Fitfor55 package would negatively impact 50 million 🇪🇺 citizens already livin… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

ECR Group

2 days ago

Do you think the 🇪🇺 has overreached❓ Because we do. 🟥 The #FutureOfEurope must be one of respect for the soverei… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

ECR Group

6 days ago

Could a federal European Union really take account for Europe's diversity❓ We don't think so. 👉 We're 27 peoples:… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

ECR Group

6 days ago

After WWII, Europeans came together to build a community of nations – a partnership of national democracies promoti… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

The Parliament Magazine

7 days ago

#MigrationEU & #asylum: EU needs to focus more on addressing the root causes of migration, argues @BeataKempa_MEP.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

Charlie Weimers MEP 🇸🇪

9 days ago

🇪🇺 Proper use of EU funding and tax payers money 🇪🇺 Very constructive and positive meeting with Commissioner for N… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

ECR Group

9 days ago

@EURACTIVItalia Wrong, @EURACTIV. @AnnaFotyga_PE stepping down from the @ECRparty board has no bearing on… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…





© 2020. All rights reserved. European Conservatives and Reformists Group